Why did I like Phantom Thread so much?
I guess the best place to
start would be the powerhouse performance from Daniel Day-Lewis, who had me
mesmerized whenever he was on screen. Even with the most minute of movements like
sewing a piece of fabric – which as high-class dressmaker Reynolds Woodcock –
Day-Lewis does a lot, he was able to imbue the action with so much meaning and
gravity.
Giving a performance just
as striking is Vicky Krieps as Alma, the object of Woodcock’s affections.
Krieps delivers a nuanced, mannered performance which packs so much sublimating,
dark emotions that when finally glimpsed, feel so incredibly justified.
The original screenplay
written by director Paul Thomas Anderson is no less intriguing. Any viewer who
expects an intricate, labyrinth-like story from Phantom Thread may come away feeling cheated, but the screenplay is
layered and complex all-the-same. I often found myself wondering just where the
story was going with no idea what was in store for these mesmerizing characters.
Anderson’s screenplay is swathed in an intangible uneasiness and I found myself
riveted by its strange – at times inexplicable – sense of foreboding.
Complimenting that mood is
outstanding, lush cinematography which lovingly lingers on the colors and
textures of fabrics in just the same way that Day-Lewis’s Woodcock surely would.
And the score – seemingly one long symphony – composed by Johnny Greenwood is
just as fitting.
I left the theatre unable
to put into words my feelings for Phantom
Thread and few movies are able to do that to me, but I now see clearly that
I, not unlike the characters of the film, fell under the spell of Phantom Thread. A beautifully-acted and produced
enigma, Phantom Thread proves to be an
engaging and ultimately disquieting picture. Its defies its audience to
understand it all at once.
My silence leaving the theatre
seems justified.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.