Today’s post I submit as
part of the 2nd Annual British Invaders Blogathon hosted by A Shroud of Thoughts.
*
I am of the opinion that
Agatha Christie is one of the finest writers who ever lived. She is the
best-selling author of all time, behind only the Bible and William Shakespeare.
Never have her books gone out of print and she remains just as popular today as
she ever was – she is the undeniable Queen of Crime.
The interesting thing about Christie’s work
though is that it is very difficult to bring to the screen. Some of her
whodunits are, at their heart, dialogue-driven books with a detective
questioning each of the suspects in turn as he or she searches for means,
motive, and opportunity. So, it is not surprising that the earliest adaptations
of Christie’s novels didn’t turn out so well – though I am myself rather
partial to Rene Clair’s 1945 And Then
There Were None and of course the brilliant Witness for the Prosecution (1957). So, it isn’t surprising that Christie was hesitant about
seeing an adaptation of one of her most famous novels Murder on the Orient Express when producers John Brabourne and
Richard B. Goodwin approached the authoress. However, Christie did give her blessing
on the film and the result, the 1974 film of the same name, is a remarkable bit of
cinema history, and perhaps the best adaptation of Christie’s work to the big
screen.
Murder on the Orient Express finds famed Belgian detective Hercule Poirot (Albert
Finney) returning to England from Istanbul aboard the Orient Express.
Frightened businessman Ratchett (Richard Widmark) is also traveling on the
Calais Coach and approaches Poirot for protection fearing his life. The
detective turns down the proposition and the following morning Ratchett is
found brutally murdered. Anyone traveling in the car is suspect. Who is responsible?
The all-star cast of Murder on the Orient Express |
The first thing which
anyone watching Murder on the Orient
Express is likely to notice about the film is the impressive cast list.
Albert Finney is joined by (to name a few): Lauren Bacall, Martin Balsam, Ingrid Bergman, Sean
Connery, John Gielgud, Anthony Perkins, Vanessa Redgrave, and Michael York. As
I noted above, Christie’s work – this novel in particular – is centralized
around interview sessions between detective and suspect. So, it is imperative
that the cast make the repetitive actions interesting to watch. And I must say
that the distinguished cast exceeds brilliantly. I truly cannot find fault with
any of the performers in the film; each of them are cast in roles which play to
their strengths. Lauren Bacall is a pleasure to watch as the loud, slightly
obnoxious American tourist; Sean Connery has great screen presence as the
haughty English colonel; and Anthony Perkins is a bit of a Psycho homage as the neurotic, mother-obsessed secretary. Top honors
though must go to Ingrid Bergman who plays against type as a Swedish
missionary. Bergman’s performance is, simply put, magnificent, especially since
she is able to convey so much in one short, five-minute scene with Albert
Finney. She deservedly won an Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress.
It has become accepted
recently to put down this film especially in light of the recent (and
brilliant) television series Agatha
Christie’s Poirot starring David Suchet as Poirot. But, frankly, I cannot
understand the criticism. Murder on the
Orient Express is a handsomely-mounted picture and Albert Finney truly
takes center-stage as Christie’s little Belgian detective. Finney’s interpretation
of the detective was the first that I saw and I think that I shall forever
associate Finney with Poirot. His mannerisms and demeanor are, slightly
different than the soft-spoken character of Christie’s novels (by comparison
Finney is far more theatrical and he gesticulates wildly at times), but he
holds the viewer’s attention with ease. The final summation of the case – which
runs nearly half an hour – is placed entirely on Finney’s shoulders and he
holds your rapt attention. Finney also has brilliant comedic timing which play
up some of the detective’s eccentricities. Bemoaning the poor food at a restaurant,
Finney’s Poirot tears up a menu and pours his coffee into a nearby plant and
later, after interviewing Jean-Pierre Cassel who has tearfully discussed the
death of his wife and child, Poirot suggests moving onto less-distressing
matters only to bring up the murder seconds later. Finney was nominated for an
Oscar for his performance and the nomination was certainly warranted.
Cast aside, Murder on the Orient Express succeeds in
generating atmosphere. The movie is, for the most part, steeped in a world of
high society. The recreated Orient Express is opulent in the extreme, but
grandeur is not the only feeling which the film can generate. The prologue
depicting the media circus which surrounded the kidnapping of the Armstrong
baby (which turns out to have a great impact on the case) is quite disquieting;
the scenes tinted yellow to mirror the yellow journalism which persisted during
the era.
A word must also be said
for Richard Rodney Bennett’s original score. His original waltz which plays as
the train pulls out of the station is inspired. It is a beautiful and jazzy
score (also Oscar-nominated) which really underscores the film in a tremendous
way.
Murder on the Orient Express was the first in a series of Agatha Christie
adaptations: 1978 saw the release of Death
on the Nile starring Peter Ustinov as Poirot. The film also featured an
all-star cast with such luminaries as Bette Davis, David Niven, and Angela
Lansbury on hand to play suspects. Lansbury returned to play Christie’s
detective Miss Marple in 1980’s The
Mirror Crack’d featuring Elizabeth Taylor, Rock Hudson, and Kim Novak. And
in 1982, Ustinov played Poirot once more in Evil
under the Sun opposite Diana Rigg, Roddy McDowell, and James Mason. But, none of these adaptations could eclipse Murder on the Orient Express. It is a
compelling film to watch and is, to this day, one of my favorites. I cannot
think of another whodunit which has done better. Even Agatha Christie,
notorious for not liking adaptations of her books, acknowledged that the movie
was a genuinely fine effort.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.